Congress Reopens the Patent-Eligibility Fight—and Inventors Have Much at Stake
Finally, Congress signals it might move PERA, but it might already be too late this term.
Finally, Congress signals it might move PERA, but it might already be too late this term.
Big Tech’s playbook is to outlast you….
“The Federal Circuit took a step towards limiting the use of ‘nuisance value” in mCom IP, LLC v. City National Bank of Florida”
NPEs Have No Obligation to Patent Mark Ramey LLP is a Texas-based intellectual property law firm dedicated to representing small patent owners, startups, and independent inventors in disputes against larger corporations. William P. Ramey III www.rameyfirm.com By William P. Ramey, III, ...
Patent enforcement is a specialized field that operates by rules most inventors never learn until they have already broken them. By the time a small inventor discovers infringement and decides to act, the most consequential decisions about the case have often already been made, usually by acciden...
“The Federal Circuit’s Opinion in mCom IP, LLC v. City Nat’l Bank of Fla. Provides useful guidance on § 285.”
The United States patent system is at an inflection point. For over a decade, patent eligibility doctrine under 35 U.S.C. §101 has drifted into uncertainty, producing inconsistent judicial outcomes and eroding the reliability of patent rights in critical areas of innovation. The Patent Eligibilit...
“Ortiz v. Vizio does not alter Wine Railway’s core holding that a non-practicing entity does not need to patent mark.”
“The proposed amendments to disclosures would severely burden patent plaintiffs and provide a playbook for deep pocket Big Tech in patent infringement litigation.”
The existence of a patent settlement license cannot mean there is a patent marking requirement without more. It is the intention of the parties to the settlement license as expressed through the terms of the settlement license that control. But Ortiz v. Vizio also underscores that an NPE must aff...
Have a read if you are concerned about the increasingly narrow public narrative surrounding patent enforcement and its impact on innovation. #LegalLift LINK TO ARTICLE
Courts should stop using the term “nuisance value” in patent cases. If courts are serious about preserving petitioning rights, encouraging settlement, and keeping § 285 tethered to law rather than intuition, they should retire the term “nuisance value” entirely. The only coherent line is the sham‑litigation line....
This article explores the Supreme Court's requirement that a case must be both objectively baseless and subjectively baseless before a court may consider the content of a settlement offer in supporting any further sanction or award......
The Supreme Court limits the use of settlement communications to establish a sham litigation to cases where both objective and subjective bad faith is found. This article explores why the same requirement of both objective and subjective bad faith is necessary before a settlement demand can be u...
Ramey LLP is taking action to protect the intellectual property rights of its client, Flick Intelligence LLC. We have filed a patent infringement lawsuit against LUCID SOFTWARE INC. in the District of Utah, Central Division. The Core of the Lawsuit: U.S. Patent No. 9,459,762 The legal action c...
Ramey LLP has filed a new patent infringement lawsuit on behalf of its client, RANDOM CHAT LLC, against KURU FOOTWEAR, INC. The case centers on U.S. Patent No. 8,402,099, which covers technology related to a “Method for Carrying Out a Multimedia Communication Based on a Network Protocol, Particul...
On September 26, 2025, Ramey LLP filed a patent infringement lawsuit on behalf of AML IP, LLC against Fetch Rewards, Inc. in the Western District of Wisconsin, Madison Division. The complaint includes a demand for a jury trial and seeks to address the unauthorized use of AML IP's patented technol...
Ramey LLP has filed a patent infringement lawsuit on behalf of its client, VDPP, LLC, against DYNAMIC DISPLAYS, INC. The suit was filed to protect VDPP's intellectual property rights related to advanced stereoscopic viewing systems. The Patents Under Dispute The legal action, filed on September...
On September 26, 2025, Ramey LLP filed a patent infringement lawsuit on behalf of VDPP, LLC against Innovative Video Technology, Inc. in the Eastern District of New York. The complaint includes a demand for a jury trial and seeks to protect VDPP's valuable intellectual property rights. The case ...
Ramey LLP is pleased to announce the filing of a patent infringement lawsuit on behalf of its client, Yopima, LLC, against CURB MOBILITY, LLC. The Technology at the Center of the Case The lawsuit, filed on September 25, 2025, focuses on the infringement of U.S. Patent No. 9,119,038. This paten...
Brooklyn, New York – September 25, 2025 – Ramey LLP has filed a patent infringement lawsuit on behalf of its client, MESA DIGITAL LLC, against JANAM TECHNOLOGIES LLC. The lawsuit concerns U.S. Patent No. 9,031,537, which relates to an “Electronic Wireless Handheld Multimedia Device.” The Origina...
Ramey LLP, a leading intellectual property law firm, has initiated a new patent infringement lawsuit on behalf of its client, VDPP LLC, against JANAM TECHNOLOGIES LLC. The Patents and Technology in Dispute The lawsuit, filed on September 25, 2025, centers on the infringement of two U.S. Patents...
Ramey LLP has initiated a new intellectual property lawsuit in the Northern District of Texas, Dallas Division, representing its client, CLOUD SYSTEMS HOLDCO LLC. The lawsuit targets HALL TECHNOLOGIES, INC. for patent infringement. The Technology and Patent at Issue The legal action, filed on...
Ramey LLP has filed a patent infringement lawsuit on behalf of its client, WIRELESSWERX IP, LLC, against FLYTREX INC. The lawsuit involves U.S. Patent No. 8,009,037, titled “Method and System to Control Movable Entities.” The case was filed in the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division, wi...
Now is the time for Congress to pass the Patent Eligibility Restoration Act. In the world of intellectual property law, striking a balance between encouraging innovation and safeguarding inventors' rights is essential. However, this balance has been thrown off in recent years, especially after t...
Safeguarding your rights won’t wait. Ramey LLP will provide the legal representation you need to protect your interests. Contact us to discuss your legal needs. Se habla español.
